Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Multichannel Marketing Class June 2: The Multichannel Database Continued

Joe Stanhope from Alterian built upon what Joe Decosmo from Allant said last night about the importance and also the difficulty of developing a database that incorporates data across functional areas and across customer touchpoints. Joe talked a little bit about Alterian, which leverages its partner relationships to help companies put all the data together and then run analytical software, campaign management software, email marketing software and web content software all using the same customer database. Joe gave an amusing example of his customer contact experiences with American Airlines. In spite of the fact that Joe is an Elite status flier and American knows a lot about him, the company still fails to make relevant offers to him using his personalized information. He has received thirty emails from the company in the last few months but offers are to where he does not fly or for benefits he does not wish to receive.

I completed our database marketing module by talking about how databases are put together. Companies typically take internal information such as customer transaction data and name and address and purchase external information, a process known as data enhancement. From this information, companies create modelled data such as RFM scores (Recency, Frequency and Monetary Value) which are usually computed in the form of deciles (ten groups), or quintiles (five groups). Customers are placed into one of the groups and marketed to accordingly. There are other ways to create modelled data and assign group scores. We talked about an alternative to RFM used by Marriott Vacation Clubs called CAP, but companies also engage in more sophisticated modelling techniques. Thus, the three types of data, modelled, internal and external, make up the basic parts of all customer databases. Types of external data might be lifestyle or psychographic data such as Claritas, PRIZM (You are where you live) which we examined in class. We also talked about how companies like Acxiom, Experian and others take data from different sources and then append that data to outside customer records to add value. These firms also use these different data sources to create their own clustering and segmentation models. Typically, a company will give an outside vendor their file to be cleaned (merge/purge, de-dup) and then records will be matched using a match code and data appended accordingly. There is a great deal of work to be done internally also to keep data clean, such as getting rid of bad records, including change of addresses, and general quality maintenance. Good data quality is a constant process. I talked a little about my research on data quality and the presentation I will make at the Marketing Science INFORMS conference on the relationship between organizational factors like a stated strategy and good teamwork and vision around customer data quality and ultimate data quality. Marketers are worried today about social media and other new marketing tools and using all channels that will be effective should be a priority for markters. However, data quality is a discipline that can reap many benefits as customer data is used across all channels.

4 comments:

Nick Serritella said...

personally I find the Prizm segmentation system very interesting. Analyzing purchase behavior and media behavior seems to be a great way to target consumers. However, many of the 66 groups seems fairly generalized. Do you think there is anyway to make the groups more detailed and specific? And do you think the field of 66 will ever expand closer to 100?

Unknown said...

Joe Stanhope was an interesting speaker. I wish he would have elaborated a little more on how the databases worked. I found the concept to be really interesting.

Unknown said...

I found the Claritas website interesting. I took a look at the town I grew up in. The demographic results were pretty accurate. This website can be used as a good tool when moving to a new city or town.

Debra Zahay-Blatz said...

Alterian's databases basically reformat data from different systems so it can be easily accessed by marketing technologists. There are a series of query tools that run off the data also. Take my database class for more details! What Claritas and others do is run clustering programs to define the optimal number of segments. If they stop at 66 it means their system is not giving them enough marginal information to justify another segment. Next stop is true 1 to 1 marketing.